Algorand (ALGO) sustainability report

NameBlockNodes SAS
Relevant legal entity identifier969500PZJWT3TD1SUI59
Name of the crypto-assetAlgorand
Beginning of the period to which the disclosure relates2025-04-29
End of the period to which the disclosure relates2026-04-29
Energy consumption1122588.92124 kWh/a
Renewable energy consumption37.9124101190 %
Energy intensity0.00002 kWh
Scope 1 DLT GHG emission - Controlled0.00000 tCO2e
Scope 2 DLT GHG emission - Purchased140.10159 tCO2e
GHG intensity0.00001 kgCO2e

Consensus Mechanism

Algorand is present on the following networks: Algorand.

The Algorand blockchain network employs a sophisticated consensus mechanism known as Pure Proof-of-Stake (PPoS), which is fundamental to how new blocks are securely validated and added to the ledger. This system is designed to ensure high performance, scalability, and broad inclusivity for all participants. At its core, PPoS leverages a Verifiable Random Function (VRF) to deterministically and unpredictably select a single block proposer, referred to as the leader, for each round of consensus. This random selection process prevents malicious actors from knowing in advance who will propose the next block, thereby enhancing network security and preventing targeted attacks.Following the block proposal by the chosen leader, a pseudorandomly selected committee of voters is formed. The size and composition of this committee are dynamically determined, and its members are responsible for evaluating the proposed block's validity. Crucially, participation in these committees is weighted by the number of Algorand's native tokens held in a user's account, a defining characteristic that distinguishes it as a "Pure" Proof-of-Stake system. For a block to be officially certified and appended to the blockchain, a supermajority of these voters must consist of honest participants who approve the block.The entire consensus process unfolds in three distinct, yet rapid, stages to maintain network efficiency. First, the "Propose" stage involves the VRF-selected leader creating and broadcasting a new block. Second, during the "Soft Vote" stage, a committee of voters assesses this proposed block for its integrity and adherence to protocol rules. Finally, the "Certify Vote" stage sees a separate committee—also pseudorandomly chosen—issue the final certification, provided the block meets the predefined honesty threshold. This multi-stage, randomized approach, underpinned by token-weighted participation, ensures robust security and fosters a highly decentralized and efficient network environment for Algorand's operations.

Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

Algorand is present on the following networks: Algorand.

The Algorand network's Pure Proof-of-Stake (PPoS) consensus mechanism is intrinsically linked to its incentive structure, which is designed to foster participation, maintain security, and ensure the network's long-term integrity. A primary incentive for users is the provision of participation rewards. Individuals who stake their native Algorand tokens by holding them in their accounts and participating in the consensus protocol receive staking rewards. These rewards are distributed periodically and are directly proportional to the amount of tokens staked, encouraging users to hold and commit their assets to support network stability and security. Beyond passive staking, active validators, known as participation nodes, who are responsible for proposing and voting on blocks, receive additional rewards for their critical role in maintaining the network's operational health.Algorand adopts a straightforward flat fee model for transactions, emphasizing predictability and user-friendliness. The standard transaction fee is notably low, typically around 0.001 of the native token per transaction, making the network highly accessible and affordable for a wide range of applications. These collected transaction fees are not simply consumed but are intelligently redistributed back into the network to its participants, specifically stakers and validators. This redistribution mechanism creates a continuous feedback loop, reinforcing incentives for ongoing participation and ensuring the sustained operation of the Algorand network.Economic security on Algorand is further bolstered by a token locking mechanism. To engage in the consensus process, users are required to lock up their native tokens. This locked stake serves as an economic security deposit. In the event of malicious behavior or protocol violations by a participant, their staked tokens can be subject to "slashing," meaning a portion or all of their deposit is forfeited. This potential financial penalty acts as a powerful deterrent against dishonest actions, thereby upholding the network's integrity. Beyond basic transactions, the network also features low fees for executing smart contracts, which are calibrated based on the computational resources consumed, ensuring fair pricing. A small fee is also levied for creating new assets (tokens) on the Algorand blockchain, a measure implemented to prevent spam and ensure the authenticity of assets on the network. This comprehensive incentive and fee structure is engineered to promote widespread, honest participation and sustainable network growth.

Energy consumption sources and methodologies

Algorand is present on the following networks: Algorand.

Algorand's energy consumption calculations are rigorously performed using a "bottom-up" methodological approach, which identifies the network's nodes as the primary contributors to its overall energy footprint. This methodology relies on a combination of empirical findings derived from publicly available information sites, internally developed crawlers, and established open-source crawling tools. These diverse data sources allow for a comprehensive collection of operational parameters across the network.A critical step in estimating hardware usage within the Algorand network involves determining the specific requirements for running the client software. These software requirements serve as key indicators for inferring the types and quantities of hardware devices utilized by participants. To ensure accuracy, the energy consumption of these identified hardware devices is precisely measured in certified test laboratories, providing reliable baseline data for the calculations. Furthermore, whenever available, the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) is employed to accurately delineate all implementations of the crypto-asset in scope, with these mappings being regularly updated based on data from the Digital Token Identifier Foundation.The process acknowledges that information regarding the exact hardware configurations and the precise number of participants in the decentralized network often requires estimation. Therefore, all assumptions made in these calculations are meticulously verified through a best-effort approach, utilizing empirical data where possible. A foundational principle guiding these estimations is the assumption that network participants are largely economically rational, meaning they act in their self-interest within the network's rules. Importantly, in situations where data is uncertain, a precautionary principle is applied, leading to conservative estimates that lean towards higher figures for potential adverse environmental impacts, ensuring a robust and responsible assessment of the network's energy consumption.

Key energy sources and methodologies

Algorand is present on the following networks: Algorand.

The methodology for determining the proportion of renewable energy utilized by the Algorand network involves a multi-faceted approach centered on identifying the geographical locations of its operational nodes. Data on these node locations are meticulously gathered from various sources, including publicly accessible information sites, specialized open-source crawlers, and proprietary in-house crawling tools. This comprehensive data collection aims to pinpoint where the network's energy-consuming activities occur.In instances where precise geographic distribution information for nodes cannot be obtained directly, the methodology intelligently references comparable blockchain networks. These reference networks are carefully selected based on their similarity in incentivization structures and consensus mechanisms, providing a proxy for energy source estimation in data-scarce scenarios. Once geographical data for the nodes (either direct or inferred) is established, this location-specific information is then cross-referenced and integrated with extensive public datasets. Specifically, data from "Our World in Data" is used, which aggregates information from reputable sources such as Ember (2025) and the Energy Institute's Statistical Review of World Energy (2024). This merging allows for an informed assessment of the local energy mix, including the share of renewables, powering the network's operations.The energy intensity of the Algorand network is a crucial metric, calculated as the marginal energy cost associated with processing one additional transaction. This calculation provides insight into the energy efficiency of the network on a per-transaction basis. The foundational data for assessing the global share of electricity generated by renewables, which informs the renewable energy proportion, is sourced from: Share of electricity generated by renewables - Ember and Energy Institute. This rigorous methodology ensures a transparent and data-driven evaluation of Algorand's energy sourcing and its environmental performance.

Key GHG sources and methodologies

Algorand is present on the following networks: Algorand.

To accurately determine the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions associated with the Algorand network, a detailed methodology is employed that primarily focuses on the geographical distribution of its operational nodes. The locations of these nodes are identified through a thorough data collection process, which incorporates information from public information sites, bespoke in-house crawlers, and established open-source crawling tools. Pinpointing these locations is essential, as the carbon intensity of electricity varies significantly by region.Should specific geographic data for the nodes be unavailable, the methodology resorts to using reference networks. These alternative networks are carefully chosen for their comparable incentivization structures and consensus mechanisms, ensuring that their energy and GHG profiles offer a relevant estimation basis. Once node location data, whether direct or inferred, is secured, it is then systematically integrated with comprehensive public datasets. A key resource in this integration is information from "Our World in Data," which compiles data from authoritative sources like Ember (2025) and the Energy Institute's Statistical Review of World Energy (2024). This integration allows for the calculation of regional carbon intensity of electricity, which is then applied to the network's energy consumption.A crucial aspect of this assessment is the calculation of GHG intensity, defined as the marginal emission generated by processing one additional transaction on the network. This metric offers a granular view of the network's carbon footprint per unit of activity. The primary external source for the carbon intensity of electricity generation, foundational to these GHG emission calculations, is cited as: Carbon intensity of electricity generation - Ember and Energy Institute. This detailed and transparent approach ensures that Algorand's GHG emissions are assessed comprehensively and with reference to credible environmental data.